Addressing the Growing Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy: Challenges and Innovations in Screening

Editor:

Rachelle Srinivas, DO

Dr. Rachelle Srinivas is a neuro-ophthalmology fellow at Michigan State University. She is the current Director of Public Health in OGT.


The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus has led to a rise in microvascular complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), which can cause a range of retinal vascular abnormalities, with the most severe cases resulting in significant visual impairment (1). 

INTRODUCTION

In 2020, approximately 3.28 million people worldwide suffered from visual impairment due to diabetic retinopathy [2], with Africa reporting the highest prevalence, followed by North America and the Caribbean [3]. The burden of DR is expected to continue to increase, with a projected worldwide prevalence of 160.50 million by 2045 [3]. 

Globally, low- and middle-income countries bear a heavier burden of the disease, with regions of highest prevalence often facing limited access to healthcare. Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment, particularly among working-age adults. Among those affected by DR, females have been found to have a higher prevalence of DR and a more significant increase in blindness due to DR compared to males [2, 4, 5]. 

SOURCE OF DISPARITY

The rise in patients with diabetes is expected to disproportionately affect low and middle-income counties compared to high-income counties [2, 6, 7]. Many areas with a high prevalence of DR are also associated with limited access to healthcare and inadequate resources and management [2]. Additionally, the prevalence of DR is associated with reduced economic productivity and educational and employment opportunities, further exacerbating the challenges these patients face [2]. 

PREVENTION METHODS EMPLOYED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE

Early screening and treatment of DR are essential to reduce the risk of patients developing severe irreversible visual impairment [2]. The implementation of improved screening methods and effective therapeutic strategies in high-income countries has resulted in reduced rates of DR-related visual impairment. However, low—and middle-income settings face the challenges of a high burden of disease coupled with low resources [2].

TELEMEDICINE

Recent technological innovations, such as telemedicine and portable devices provide promising methods to increase the accessibility of screening services [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Telemedicine allows for increased accessibility of screening as ophthalmologists can remotely evaluate digital fundus photography and provide suggestions for further follow-up and treatment [8, 13]. Studies evaluating the use of telemedicine for DR screening have shown promising results with high patient satisfaction and the ability to detect disease early [13]. Additionally, telemedicine can help providers meet the high need for screening that might otherwise prove challenging due to the limited availability of office visits. 

PORTABLE SCREENING DEVICES

There is also ongoing research evaluating the utility of portable devices such as handheld fundus cameras and smartphone-based fundus cameras for screening, and these tools have been implemented in screening initiatives in low-income regions [8, 10, 11, 13, 14]. Such portable devices provide a cost-efficient alternative to traditional fundus cameras and have the added benefit of easy portability without extensive training needed for operators [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The Zeiss Visuscout 100, Optomed Aurora, and Volk Pictor Plus are three models of handheld fundus cameras that have shown promising results so far and have been shown to capture photos that are of sufficient quality for DR screening [10, 11, 12, 14]. Several smartphone-based devices and imaging systems have also shown encouraging results [9, 14]. 

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

In addition, the emerging rise in artificial intelligence (AI) has also led to efforts to incorporate AI with screening [15]. Studies have found encouraging results regarding DR detection by AI algorithms [6]. The use of AI for DR screening could further help alleviate the mismatch between the high burden of disease and a limited number of providers, and it could also allow for faster provision of results so patients can receive timely referrals and treatment as needed. 

CONCLUSION

Visual impairment due to the complications of diabetic disease is a concerning public health issue that is projected to increase in prevalence and disproportionately affect low and middle-income countries. Fortunately, screening and timely treatment can effectively improve patient outcomes, and there are exciting innovations and methods that can contribute to the accessibility and cost-efficiency of screening efforts.

REFERENCES

  1. Wang W, Lo ACY. Diabetic Retinopathy: Pathophysiology and Treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(6):1816. Published 2018 Jun 20. doi:10.3390/ijms19061816

  2. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study; GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020. Eye (Lond). 2024;38(11):2047-2057. doi:10.1038/s41433-024-03101-5

  3. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):1580-1591. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027

  4. Zegeye AF, Temachu YZ, Mekonnen CK. Prevalence and factors associated with Diabetes retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients at Northwest Amhara Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia 2021. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23(1):9. Published 2023 Jan 5. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02746-8

  5. Li M, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. Females with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Are Prone to Diabetic Retinopathy: A Twelve-Province Cross-Sectional Study in China. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:5814296. Published 2020 Apr 21. doi:10.1155/2020/5814296

  6. Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Strategies to Tackle the Global Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy: From Epidemiology to Artificial Intelligence. Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(1):9-20. doi:10.1159/000502387

  7. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4-14. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007

  8. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4-14. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007

  9. Micheletti JM, Hendrick AM, Khan FN, Ziemer DC, Pasquel FJ. Current and Next Generation Portable Screening Devices for Diabetic Retinopathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(2):295-300. Published 2016 Feb 16. doi:10.1177/1932296816629158

  10. Midena E, Zennaro L, Lapo C, et al. Handheld Fundus Camera for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Comparison Study with Table-Top Fundus Camera in Real-Life Setting. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2352. Published 2022 Apr 22. doi:10.3390/jcm11092352

  11. Midena E, Zennaro L, Lapo C, Torresin T, Midena G, Frizziero L. Comparison of 50° handheld fundus camera versus ultra-widefield table-top fundus camera for diabetic retinopathy detection and grading. Eye (Lond). 2023;37(14):2994-2999. doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02458-3\

  12. Piyasena MMPN, Yip JLY, MacLeod D, Kim M, Gudlavalleti VSM. Diagnostic test accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by physician graders using a hand-held non-mydriatic retinal camera at a tertiary level medical clinic. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):89. Published 2019 Apr 8. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1092-3

  13. Bastos de Carvalho A, Ware SL, Lei F, Bush HM, Sprang R, Higgins EB. Implementation and sustainment of a statewide telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening network for federally designated safety-net clinics. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241767. Published 2020 Nov 4. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241767

  14. Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, Arulmalar S, Usha M. Review of retinal cameras for global coverage of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(1):162-172. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01262-7

  15. Lupidi M, Danieli L, Fruttini D, et al. Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: clinical assessment using handheld fundus camera in a real-life setting. Acta Diabetol. 2023;60(8):1083-1088. doi:10.1007/s00592-023-02104-0

Previous
Previous

Illuminating Vision: The Mazava Project in Madagascar

Next
Next

Key Insights from: National Eye Institute at Risk – Key Takeaways for Vision Scientists